The image of a bull in the pictures of the Ketpen ridge (based on materials from the gorges Nauakesken, Uzynkungey)

Authors

  • Asel Amargazieva State Historical and Cultural Reserve-Museum «Issyk»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52967/akz2022.2.16.9.23

Keywords:

archaeology, Ketpen, petroglyph, art, bull, myth, worldview, ideology, Bronze Age

Abstract

Petroglyphs are one of the earliest sources of information about the life, culture and worldview of ancient people. Currently, various methods for studying petroglyphs have been developed and historical knowledge in this area has been accumulated to a sufficient extent. However, one of the urgent problems of modern science still remains a comprehensive study of rock paintings that require the solution of issues related to the definition of chronology, semantic interpretation, etc. The author in this article presents the results of a comparative historical, cultural and semiotic study of the image of a bull on rock paintings located in Almaty areas on the northern slopes of the Ketpen ridge in the Nauakesken and Uzunkungey gorges. Since these rock paintings are still little-studied objects. The research of scientists focused on the ideas of ancient peoples was taken as a basis in order to determine the main reasons for drawing the image of animals on the surface of a stone, understanding the worldview of the plot of petroglyphs, the chronology and description of petroglyphs. In addition, rock carvings from Zhetysu and South Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan were compared. In addition, in the future, along with rock paintings, the author noted the relevance of studying local archaeological sites.

References

Akishev, A. K. 1984. Iskusstvo i mifologiya sakov (The art and mythology of the Sakas). Alma-Ata: “Nauka” Publ. (in Russian).

Amanzholov, A. S. 1966. In: Izvestiya AN KazSSR. Ser. obshchestv. nauk (News of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR. Ser. societies. sciences), 2, 79-96 (in Russian).

Amargazieva, A. J. 2020. In: Otan tarihy (The homeland history), 2 (90), 181-191 (in Kazakh).

Artamonov, M. I. 1962. In: Soobshcheniya Gosudarctvennogo Ermitazha (Peports of the State Hermitage), 22, 30-35 (in Russian).

Zdanovich, D. G. 1995. In: Zdanovich, G. B. (ed.), Ivanova, N. O. (compl.). Arkaim. Issledovaniya, poiski, otkrytiya (Arkaim. Research, search, discovery). Chelyabinsk: Tvorcheskoe obiedinenie “Kamennyi poyas”, 43-53 (in Russian).

Zikiriya, D. K., Amargazieva, A. Zh. 2021. In: Mukhtarova, G. R. (ed.). II Esik okulary (2nd Issyk readings). Almaty: Kazakh University, 162-168 (in Kazakh).

Otchet o nauchno-issledovatelskoy rabote (itogovyi) (Research report (final)). 2018. № GR 0111RK00329. Inv. No. 0218RK01399 (in Russian).

Kadyrbayev, M. K., Maryashev, A. N. 1977. Naskalnye izobrazheniya hrebta Karatau (Rock carvings of the Karatau ridge). Almaty: “Gylym” Publ. (in Russian).

Kubarev, V. D. 2006. In: Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Yevrazii (Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia), 3 (27), 41-54 (in Russian).

Margulan, A. Kh. 2003. Petroglify Saryarki (Petroglyphs of Saryarka). Almaty: “Dayk-Press” (in Russian).

Samashev, Z. 2012. Zhetysu zhartas suretterí. Bayan zhurek (Zhetysu rock paintings. Bayan zhurek). Astana: the Brunch of the Margulan Institute of Archaeology in Astana (in Kazakh, Russian, English).

Bednarik, R. G. 2015. In: Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici, 40, 7-30 (in English).

Herman, L. 2018. In: INORA, 80, 22-31 (in English).

Hermann, L. 2021. In: Mukhtarova, G. R. (ed.). II Esik okulary (2nd Issyk readings). Almaty: Kazakh University, 77-88 (in English).

Okladnikova, E. 2015. In: International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 1012-1019 (in English).

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Amargazieva А. (2022). The image of a bull in the pictures of the Ketpen ridge (based on materials from the gorges Nauakesken, Uzynkungey). Kazakhstan Archeology, (2 (16), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.52967/akz2022.2.16.9.23

Issue

Section

Archaeology issues

Most read articles by the same author(s)